From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-88876-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 24419 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2004 23:31:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 24412 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2004 23:31:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO granger.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.148)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Jan 2004 23:31:25 -0000
Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com)
	by granger.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
	id 1AgY0K-0003OD-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:31:25 -0500
Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id AC7264B104; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:31:43 -0500 (EST)
To: dje@watson.ibm.com
Subject: Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Message-Id: <20040113233143.AC7264B104@berman.michael-chastain.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 23:31:00 -0000
From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain)
X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00831.txt.bz2

David Edelsohn lists some priorities:

  * Correct code generation
  * Fewer ICEs
  * Standards conformance
  * Compilation speed
  * Performance
  * Features
  * Release frequency
  * Release timeliness

I would like to add:

  * Correct debug info generation

Michael C