From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26560 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2004 11:08:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26549 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2004 11:08:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cenedra.office) (213.160.108.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2004 11:08:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 31495 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2004 11:08:50 -0000 Received: from bob.mobile (192.168.0.2) by cenedra.office with SMTP; 17 Jan 2004 11:08:50 -0000 From: Andrew Walrond To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 11:08:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <1074298740.3147.79.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1074298740.3147.79.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401171108.49846.andrew@walrond.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01036.txt.bz2 As a passive observer on this mailing list, I would feel a lot happier about SSA going into 3.5 if I didn't still have the bad taste from the "Lets chuck 3.4 out the door, warts an all, as fast as possible" thread which got everybody so worked up recently. I really like the sound of SSA going into 3.5, but it surely makes 3.4 a much more important release with the emphasis on quaility rather than haste, because we users ar going to depend on it for much longer, even beyond a 3.5 release if ada/g77 will be missing. Andrew Walrond