From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7312 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2004 21:24:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7287 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2004 21:24:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2004 21:24:38 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i0HLOal24897; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 16:24:36 -0500 Received: from speedy.slc.redhat.com (vpn50-8.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.8]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i0HLOZa25595; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 16:24:35 -0500 Received: from redhat.com (law@localhost) by speedy.slc.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i0HLMo1g031127; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:22:51 -0700 Message-Id: <200401172122.i0HLMo1g031127@speedy.slc.redhat.com> X-Authentication-Warning: speedy.slc.redhat.com: law owned process doing -bs To: Paul Brook cc: Scott Robert Ladd , gcc mailing list Reply-To: law@redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:57:29 GMT." <200401171457.29989.paul@codesourcery.com> From: law@redhat.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 21:24:00 -0000 X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01117.txt.bz2 In message <200401171457.29989.paul@codesourcery.com>, Paul Brook writes: >Gfortran requires much of the tree-ssa infrastructure (GENERIC, etc.), and >will probably not be merged without it. Right. Though it does not necessarily depend on the optimization aspects of tree-ssa. >g77 will probably never be made to work with tree-ssa. IMHO such effort would >be better directed towards making gfortran work properly. Agreed 100%. jeff