* Re: [patch] MAINTAINERS cleanup
@ 2004-01-17 23:13 Volker Reichelt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Volker Reichelt @ 2004-01-17 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pinskia; +Cc: gcc, gcc-patches, mark
On 16 Jan, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> Did that, i.e. I committed the patch below to mainline and 3.3 branch:
>>
>> But somebody else has to take care of logins etc. (if there are any).
>
> Can you also apply this to the 3.4 branch?
Sure. I already did that yesterday, but didn't have a chance to reply to
your mail more quickly, sorry.
Thanks for pointing this out!
Regards,
Volker
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] MAINTAINERS cleanup
2004-01-16 23:44 Volker Reichelt
@ 2004-01-16 23:47 ` Andrew Pinski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Pinski @ 2004-01-16 23:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Volker Reichelt; +Cc: gcc, gcc-patches, Andrew Pinski, mark
On Jan 16, 2004, at 15:42, Volker Reichelt wrote:
> Mark Mitchell wrote:
>>> Since he only appears in MAINTAINERS with a question mark, and since
>>> the SC never approved him to maintain anything, I suggest that the
>>> three
>>> question-mark people be removed from MAINTAINERS.
>>
>> I agree.
>>
>> Volker, would you go ahead and make that change? If any of the three
>> affected parties pipes up, we can consider undoing it at that point.
>
> Did that, i.e. I committed the patch below to mainline and 3.3 branch:
>
> But somebody else has to take care of logins etc. (if there are any).
Can you also apply this to the 3.4 branch?
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [patch] MAINTAINERS cleanup
@ 2004-01-16 23:44 Volker Reichelt
2004-01-16 23:47 ` Andrew Pinski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Volker Reichelt @ 2004-01-16 23:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mark; +Cc: gcc, gcc-patches
Mark Mitchell wrote:
> > Since he only appears in MAINTAINERS with a question mark, and since
> > the SC never approved him to maintain anything, I suggest that the three
> > question-mark people be removed from MAINTAINERS.
>
> I agree.
>
> Volker, would you go ahead and make that change? If any of the three
> affected parties pipes up, we can consider undoing it at that point.
Did that, i.e. I committed the patch below to mainline and 3.3 branch:
But somebody else has to take care of logins etc. (if there are any).
Regards,
Volker
2004-01-17 Volker Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
* MAINTAINERS: Remove entries without email address.
Index: MAINTAINERS
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/MAINTAINERS,v
retrieving revision 1.253.2.17
diff -u -p -r1.253.2.17 MAINTAINERS
--- MAINTAINERS 10 Jan 2004 18:50:14 -0000 1.253.2.17
+++ MAINTAINERS 16 Jan 2004 23:32:21 -0000
@@ -265,7 +265,3 @@ GNATS only accounts
Wolfgang Bangerth bangerth bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu
James Dennett jdennett jdennett@acm.org
Christian Ehrhardt cae ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de
-
-Peter Bienstman(?)
-Benjamin Chelf(?)
-Mark Galassi(?)
===================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-17 23:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-01-17 23:13 [patch] MAINTAINERS cleanup Volker Reichelt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-16 23:44 Volker Reichelt
2004-01-16 23:47 ` Andrew Pinski
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).