From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22809 invoked by alias); 18 Jan 2004 23:34:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22801 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2004 23:34:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz) (195.113.19.66) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Jan 2004 23:34:08 -0000 Received: from sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz (sunsite.mff.cuni.cz [127.0.0.1]) by sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0ILQmxL021567; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 22:26:48 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i0ILQmQn021565; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 22:26:48 +0100 Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 23:34:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Jan Hubicka Cc: Chris Lattner , Jan Hubicka , Richard Henderson , "Kaveh R. Ghazi" , ian@wasabisystems.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, "Joseph S. Myers" Subject: Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Message-ID: <20040118212647.GO6413@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <20040118224838.GL5119@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20040118232701.GA31365@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040118232701.GA31365@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01223.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 12:27:01AM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote: > I think that at least glibc has special marker for each external symbol > so it is not concern there. No. glibc has some markers for internal symbols which are not static (__attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) ). But in the end what is really exported is controlled by the linker version script. Jakub