From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13130 invoked by alias); 18 Jan 2004 22:37:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13108 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2004 22:37:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com) (66.187.237.200) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Jan 2004 22:37:52 -0000 Received: from frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0IMbpOG014991; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 14:37:51 -0800 Received: (from rth@localhost) by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i0IMbpLg014989; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 14:37:51 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 22:37:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Jan Hubicka Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" , "Kaveh R. Ghazi" , ian@wasabisystems.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Message-ID: <20040118223751.GB14927@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , Jan Hubicka , "Joseph S. Myers" , "Kaveh R. Ghazi" , ian@wasabisystems.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <20040118083738.10772.qmail@gossamer.airs.com> <200401181357.i0IDvpWF004706@caip.rutgers.edu> <20040118220522.GA14767@redhat.com> <20040118222201.GD11268@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040118222201.GD11268@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01204.txt.bz2 On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 11:22:01PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote: > What is preventing us from declaring the structure as constant so we > should get propagation even with current design? Targets that modify the structure at startup. r~