From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11641 invoked by alias); 19 Jan 2004 03:42:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11624 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2004 03:42:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nef.ens.fr) (129.199.96.32) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Jan 2004 03:42:16 -0000 Received: from quatramaran.ens.fr (quatramaran.ens.fr [129.199.129.64]) by nef.ens.fr (8.12.10/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id i0J3gGaW043902 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 04:42:16 +0100 (CET) Received: by quatramaran.ens.fr (Postfix, from userid 561) id 0593F48A4; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 04:42:16 +0100 (CET) To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal X-Newsgroups: ens.mailing-lists.egcs.general In-Reply-To: <20040119013113.044D74895@quatramaran.ens.fr> References: <90200277-4301-11D8-BDBD-000A95B1F520@apple.com> <20040110002526.GA13568@disaster.jaj.com> <82D6F34E-4306-11D8-BDBD-000A95B1F520@apple.com> <20040110154129.GA28152@disaster.jaj.com> <1073935323.3458.42.camel@minax.codesourcery.com> <1073951351.3458.162.camel@minax.codesourcery.com> Organization: Cc: Message-Id: <20040119034216.0593F48A4@quatramaran.ens.fr> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 03:42:00 -0000 From: espie@quatramaran.ens.fr (Marc Espie) X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01234.txt.bz2 In fact, I finally got around to building gcc-head, and comparing it to gcc 3.3.2. To say that the results are disappointing would be an understatement: Time for a kernel compile, gcc 3.3.2: 276.63s real 193.01s user 26.86s system with gcc-head: 341.31s real 213.25s user 27.87s system Exact same options, basically -O2. Now, tell me again that GCC is getting faster...