From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-89291-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 14131 invoked by alias); 19 Jan 2004 08:12:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14113 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2004 08:12:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mailhost2.tudelft.nl) (130.161.180.2)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Jan 2004 08:12:40 -0000
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by rav.antivirus (Postfix) with SMTP
	id CE2A65785; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 09:12:39 +0100 (MET)
Received: from listserv.tudelft.nl (listserv.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.33])
	by mailhost2.tudelft.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B49354B47; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 09:12:39 +0100 (MET)
Received: from steven.lr-s.tudelft.nl (hekje1.shuis.tudelft.nl [145.94.192.78])
	by listserv.tudelft.nl (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0J8CdQP010575;
	Mon, 19 Jan 2004 09:12:39 +0100 (MET)
Received: by steven.lr-s.tudelft.nl (Postfix, from userid 500)
	id 2748C69233; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 09:10:34 +0100 (CET)
From: Steven Bosscher <stevenb@suse.de>
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>,
	"Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
Subject: Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 08:12:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
Cc: "Marc Espie" <espie@quatramaran.ens.fr>, <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <90200277-4301-11D8-BDBD-000A95B1F520@apple.com> <24a301c3de45$ed34dc40$34b82997@bagio> <m3r7xwy2k2.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>
In-Reply-To: <m3r7xwy2k2.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>
Organization: SUSE Labs
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200401190910.34723.stevenb@suse.de>
X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01246.txt.bz2

On Monday 19 January 2004 05:39, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it> writes:
> | Testcases would help. We seriously do care about all the compile-time
> | regressions we have in bugzilla, but we have just a few of
> | them. People should really file bugreports about it.
>
> Strongly seconded.  In private, I've told Marc that the more people
> complain (i.e. filling reports) about their being bitten by
> compile-time perforamnce, the more it is likely that GCC developers
> will eventually care about it.

Perhaps everyone has missed some of the work Honza has done this
month to kill some of the most tough bottlenecks, and perhaps
nobody has seen the numbers posted by Gerald that for his C++
test case we _are_ much faster than 3.3 and 3.2?

Gr.
Steven