From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13215 invoked by alias); 19 Jan 2004 22:40:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13202 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2004 22:40:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Jan 2004 22:40:10 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i0JMGgO16005 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 17:16:42 -0500 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i0JMe2M01352; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 17:40:02 -0500 Received: from dot.sfbay.redhat.com (dot.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.7]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i0JMe2b14717; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 14:40:02 -0800 Received: (from rth@localhost) by dot.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i0JMdax14274; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 14:39:36 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: dot.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 22:40:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: law@redhat.com Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Your change causing regressions Message-ID: <20040119223935.GA14268@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , law@redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <200401192216.i0JMGXQv028490@speedy.slc.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401192216.i0JMGXQv028490@speedy.slc.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01399.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 03:16:33PM -0700, law@redhat.com wrote: > Is causing libstdc++ regressions. Specifically: > > FAIL: 27_io/basic_filebuf/underflow/wchar_t/9178.cc execution test Hum. I should get some of these machines updated so that I'm not used to all the locale/widechar tests failing... I'll look into it. r~