From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-89434-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 32196 invoked by alias); 19 Jan 2004 21:46:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 32172 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2004 21:46:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.libertysurf.net) (213.36.80.91)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Jan 2004 21:46:02 -0000
Received: from localhost.localdomain (213.36.55.64) by mail.libertysurf.net (6.5.033)
        id 3FFAFD920115C3A7; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 22:45:47 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
To: Eric Christopher <echristo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 21:46:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3
Cc: Robert Dewar <dewar@gnat.com>,
 Scott Robert Ladd <coyote@coyotegulch.com>,
 Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>,
 Nick Burrett <nick@dsvr.net>,
 Marc Espie <espie@quatramaran.ens.fr>,
 geoffk@apple.com,
 gcc@gcc.gnu.org
References: <90200277-4301-11D8-BDBD-000A95B1F520@apple.com> <200401192207.58846.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <1074546942.11041.8.camel@dzur.sfbay.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1074546942.11041.8.camel@dzur.sfbay.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <200401192246.52526.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01389.txt.bz2

> And perhaps the improvement in code quality indicates that there is
> something right in the development process.

I think we can both agree that all is in the balance between code quality 
improvement and compilation speed degradation.

-- 
Eric Botcazou