public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Your change causing regressions
@ 2004-01-19 22:18 law
  2004-01-19 22:40 ` Richard Henderson
  2004-01-20  1:57 ` Richard Henderson
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: law @ 2004-01-19 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: rth; +Cc: gcc


This change:




2004-01-18  Richard Henderson  <rth@redhat.com>
 
        * tree-sra.c (REALPART_INDEX, IMAGPART_INDEX): Remove.
        (sra_candidates, needs_copy_in): Use a bitmap.  Update all users.
        (struct sra_elt, sra_elt_hash, sra_elt_eq): New.
        (sra_map_size): Remove.
        (sra_map): Use a htab_t.
        (lookup_scalar): Update to match.
        (get_scalar_for_field, get_scalar_for_complex_part): Likewise.
        (scalarize_structure_assignment): Use annotate_all_with_locus.
        (csc_build_component_ref): Remove index argument.
        (csc_build_complex_part): Take tree_code, not index.
        (create_scalar_copies): Don't collect indicies.
        (emit_scalar_copies): New.
        (scalarize_modify_expr, scalarize_tree_list): Use it.
        (scalarize_return_expr): Likewise.
        (scalarize_structures): Simplify needs_copy_in iteration.
        (scalarize_call_expr): Use annotate_all_with_locus.
        (dump_sra_map_trav): Split from ...
        (dump_sra_map): ... here.  Update for hash table.
        (tree_sra): Update for new datastructures.


Is causing libstdc++ regressions.  Specifically:

FAIL: 27_io/basic_filebuf/underflow/wchar_t/9178.cc execution test



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Your change causing regressions
  2004-01-19 22:18 Your change causing regressions law
@ 2004-01-19 22:40 ` Richard Henderson
  2004-01-20  1:57 ` Richard Henderson
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2004-01-19 22:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: law; +Cc: gcc

On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 03:16:33PM -0700, law@redhat.com wrote:
> Is causing libstdc++ regressions.  Specifically:
> 
> FAIL: 27_io/basic_filebuf/underflow/wchar_t/9178.cc execution test

Hum.  I should get some of these machines updated so that
I'm not used to all the locale/widechar tests failing...

I'll look into it.


r~

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Your change causing regressions
  2004-01-19 22:18 Your change causing regressions law
  2004-01-19 22:40 ` Richard Henderson
@ 2004-01-20  1:57 ` Richard Henderson
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2004-01-20  1:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: law; +Cc: gcc

On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 03:16:33PM -0700, law@redhat.com wrote:
> FAIL: 27_io/basic_filebuf/underflow/wchar_t/9178.cc execution test

Grr.  This test won't fail without using PCH, and the difference
between non-PCH and PCH .gimple dumps is too large to easily analyze.

Hopefully a compiler with just the patch reverted will be able to
load the same PCH file...


r~

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-20  1:57 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-01-19 22:18 Your change causing regressions law
2004-01-19 22:40 ` Richard Henderson
2004-01-20  1:57 ` Richard Henderson

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).