From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10451 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2004 01:57:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10434 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2004 01:57:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com) (66.187.237.200) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Jan 2004 01:57:56 -0000 Received: from frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0K1vuQA003443; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 17:57:56 -0800 Received: (from rth@localhost) by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i0K1vuRg003441; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 17:57:56 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 01:57:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: law@redhat.com Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Your change causing regressions Message-ID: <20040120015756.GA3417@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , law@redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <200401192216.i0JMGXQv028490@speedy.slc.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401192216.i0JMGXQv028490@speedy.slc.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01422.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 03:16:33PM -0700, law@redhat.com wrote: > FAIL: 27_io/basic_filebuf/underflow/wchar_t/9178.cc execution test Grr. This test won't fail without using PCH, and the difference between non-PCH and PCH .gimple dumps is too large to easily analyze. Hopefully a compiler with just the patch reverted will be able to load the same PCH file... r~