From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-89507-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 15399 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2004 09:50:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15380 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2004 09:50:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz) (195.113.18.106)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Jan 2004 09:50:13 -0000
Received: from camelot.ms.mff.cuni.cz (kampanus.ms.mff.cuni.cz [195.113.18.107])
	by nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 16B314DF17; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 10:50:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: by camelot.ms.mff.cuni.cz (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 20 Jan 2004 10:50:13 +0100
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 09:50:00 -0000
From: Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>, Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>,
	gcc@gcc.gnu.org, law@redhat.com
Subject: Re: tree-SSA and indirect references.
Message-ID: <20040120095013.GC7878@kam.mff.cuni.cz>
References: <20040120003156.GE8495@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20040120005924.GA3079@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040120005924.GA3079@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01462.txt.bz2

> On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 01:31:56AM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > vara=(type *)&varb;
> > varc=*vara;
> > 
> > this is common for small aggregate casts that can stay in registers
> > after compiling.  What is our strategy to deal with this?
> 
> I don't know.  I think it depends what the set of all these types are.

In the case of Gerald's testcase these are different classes inherited
from each other.
They are iterators so the structures are small, I think containing just
one field.

Honza
> 
> 
> r~