* g++ 3.3.1 (cygwin)
@ 2004-01-20 22:27 Jimen Ching
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jimen Ching @ 2004-01-20 22:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
Hi,
Is the following code legal C++? Because I didn't get any errors, and I'm
expecting to get an error when I access me->test in struct2::func(), since
it's private. Did the standard allow this and I've overlooked it?
class struct1
{
public:
struct1(int i) : s2(this) { test = i; }
void func(int i) { s2.func(i); }
private:
int test;
struct struct2
{
struct1 *me;
struct2(struct1 *s) { me = s; }
void func(int i) { me->test = i; }
};
struct2 s2;
};
int
main()
{
struct1 s1(1);
s1.func(2);
return 0;
}
--jc
--
Jimen Ching (WH6BRR) jching@flex.com wh6brr@uhm.ampr.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2004-01-20 22:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-01-20 22:27 g++ 3.3.1 (cygwin) Jimen Ching
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).