From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-89787-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8251 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2004 10:04:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8173 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2004 10:04:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.58)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Jan 2004 10:04:35 -0000
Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (pc960.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.205.4])
	by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0MA4PAO010339;
	Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:04:26 GMT
Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (rearnsha@localhost)
	by pc960.cambridge.arm.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id i0MA4Pi13259;
	Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:04:25 GMT
Message-Id: <200401221004.i0MA4Pi13259@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: pc960.cambridge.arm.com: rearnsha owned process doing -bs
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Robert Dewar <dewar@gnat.com>,
        Nick Burrett <nick@dsvr.net>,
        Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>,
        Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@apple.com>,
        Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>,
        Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>,
        Marc Espie <espie@quatramaran.ens.fr>,
        Scott Robert Ladd <coyote@coyotegulch.com>
Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Organization: ARM Ltd.
X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd)
X-Fax: +44 1223 400410
X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ.
X-Url: http://www.arm.com/
Subject: Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 22 Jan 2004 02:38:07 +0100."
             <A120D8FC-4C7B-11D8-90BE-000A95A4DC02@kernel.crashing.org> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:38:00 -0000
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01742.txt.bz2

> > But on the other hand, caches were smaller, not backed by L2, and were
> > often allocate-on-write only (so zeroing a structure can be very
> 
> Did you mean to say allocate-on-read, or am I just confused beyond 
> words?
> 

Err, I meant to say that they were *not* allocate-on-write -- which 
amounts to about the same thing, yes.

R.