From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-90010-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 19808 invoked by alias); 26 Jan 2004 20:39:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19728 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2004 20:39:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.uk.superh.com) (193.128.105.170)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Jan 2004 20:39:00 -0000
Received: from sh-uk-ex01.uk.w2k.superh.com (sh-uk-ex01 [192.168.16.17])
	by smtp.uk.superh.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0QKcrlh012495;
	Mon, 26 Jan 2004 20:38:53 GMT
Received: from linsvr1.uk.superh.com ([192.168.16.50]) by sh-uk-ex01.uk.w2k.superh.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
	 Mon, 26 Jan 2004 20:40:17 +0000
Received: (from renneckej@localhost)
	by linsvr1.uk.superh.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i0QKcqi14559;
	Mon, 26 Jan 2004 20:38:52 GMT
From: Joern Rennecke <joern.rennecke@superh.com>
Message-Id: <200401262038.i0QKcqi14559@linsvr1.uk.superh.com>
Subject: Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha
To: gerald@pfeifer.com (Gerald Pfeifer)
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 20:53:00 -0000
Cc: joern.rennecke@superh.com (Joern Rennecke),
        ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr (Eric Botcazou),
        rth@redhat.com (Richard Henderson),
        rsandifo@redhat.com (Richard Sandiford),
        roger@eyesopen.com (Roger Sayle), gcc@gcc.gnu.org,
        gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.58.0401262044560.8891@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> from "Gerald Pfeifer" at Jan 26, 2004 08:46:04 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jan 2004 20:40:17.0358 (UTC) FILETIME=[9B796EE0:01C3E44C]
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39
X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg01965.txt.bz2

> 
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2004, Joern Rennecke wrote:
> > Isn't it up to the release manager to specify which patches he wants to
> > be applied to the branch?
> 
> Currently the 3.4 branch is open for regression fixes.

Ok, I have checked the patch in, relying on Richard Sandiford's
regression test.

The 3.3 branch is also marked as open for bug fixes, but
we still need somebody to test the two patches in the 3.3 branch
on one of the affected systems to get closure on PR optimization/11864.