From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29564 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2004 18:19:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29556 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2004 18:19:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com) (66.187.237.200) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Mar 2004 18:19:39 -0000 Received: from frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i22IJPIS021966; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:19:25 -0800 Received: (from rth@localhost) by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i22IJPxN021964; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:19:25 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 18:19:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Gunther Nikl Cc: Richard Zidlicky , Bernardo Innocenti , peter@baradas.org, Matthias Klose , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Andreas Schwab Subject: Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Message-ID: <20040302181925.GA21941@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , Gunther Nikl , Richard Zidlicky , Bernardo Innocenti , peter@baradas.org, Matthias Klose , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Andreas Schwab References: <4009E670.5090600@develer.com> <16394.22429.131429.162236@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20040301200553.GA4188@linux-m68k.org> <20040301215409.GA18138@linux-m68k.org> <4043D2EB.1050602@develer.com> <20040302085305.GA1482@linux-m68k.org> <20040302104300.GA23887@lorien.int.gecko.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040302104300.GA23887@lorien.int.gecko.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00158.txt.bz2 On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 11:43:00AM +0100, Gunther Nikl wrote: > > I am pretty sure more it results in more damage later on. > > Yes, that looks like a bug. i386.h has "argptr" included in > FIXED_REGISTERS and gives it a nonzero value. Yes. There are three such arrays that *must* include *all* registers, including such special purpose registers. r~