LD vs multilibs

LD vs multilibs

[Phil Edwards]

Looking at this thread:

    http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-09/msg00974.html

Has been solved somewhere and I can't find it in the archives?

If not, then:  yes, I deleted it because I was told automake was working
around these issues.  That seems not to be the case, so we need to do it
ourselves again.  There's a patched configure[*] here:

    http://www.devphil.com/~pme/configure.bz2

Please tell me if that helps at all.


[*] Two Point One Freaking Megs of very repetitive shell script, before
    compression.

Re: LD vs multilibs

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Mar  8, 2004, Phil Edwards <phil@jaj.com> wrote:

> Looking at this thread:
>     http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-09/msg00974.html

> Has been solved somewhere and I can't find it in the archives?

For the record from IRC discussion: the unsharing of config.cache
between different libs within a multilib may have hidden the problem,
but I'm pretty sure it hasn't been fixed.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva             http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}