public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:09:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200403091809.i29I9P04020607@sirius.codesourcery.com> (raw)


[I tried to send this out last night, but apparently failed.]

GCC 3.4
=======

Unfortunately, although progress was made last week, we still have a
ways to go.  We're down to 48 regressions targeted at 3.4.1, down from
57.  Some of those have patches that I've approved for 3.4, but there
are a lot that do not.  We're not ready to spin prerelease bits yet.

I'd particularly like to understand this RTX_UNCHANGING_P optimization
issue.  We've bumped into this before.  I think we need to take the
conservative approach, even if that is pessimizing in some case.
Would someone who understands the details of this bug please summarize
it, mail that to me, and also add that information to the appropriate
PR?

Some of the other PRs also look pretty significant.  I'll continue to
beat on the C++ issues, but there are serious issues with debugging
(13974) and with wrong code (14381, 14470, 12863, 13424, 13632).

Henceforth, please do not make any non-documentation check-ins to the
3.4 branch without my explicit approval.  To get that approval, please
do *not* send me mail directly.  Instead, add your patch to the
relevant PR, which must be targeted at 3.r, and add me to the CC list
for the PR.  Note that this procedure implies that if there is no PR
targeted at 3.4 I will not accept the patch.

Furthermore, please do not create any new PRs targeted for 3.4 without
my explicit permission.  If it's a regression, target it for 3.4.1.
If you think it might need to be fixed in 3.4, add me to the CC list,
and add a note asking me to move back the target.  Please do not do
this unless the PR is wrong-code, ICE-on-valid, or bootstrap for a
primary target.  New PRs referring to other categories of error are
simply not going to get fixed for 3.4.

GCC 3.5
=======

In a holding pattern until tree-ssa merge is complete.

--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com

             reply	other threads:[~2004-03-09 18:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-09 18:09 Mark Mitchell [this message]
2004-03-11  9:45 ` Eric Botcazou
2004-03-11 12:48   ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-03-11 21:11     ` Richard Henderson
2004-03-16 16:53   ` Mark Mitchell
2004-03-16 16:59     ` Paul Koning
2004-03-16 17:11       ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-03-16 17:24         ` Zack Weinberg
2004-03-16 17:25           ` Paul Koning
2004-03-17 10:56     ` Eric Botcazou
2004-03-17 11:49       ` Eric Botcazou
2004-03-17 15:55       ` Mark Mitchell
2004-03-18  8:25         ` Eric Botcazou
2004-03-18 18:31           ` Eric Botcazou
2004-03-18 19:15             ` Mark Mitchell
2004-03-18 23:36               ` Eric Botcazou
2004-03-18 23:41                 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-03-19  1:23                   ` Eric Botcazou
2004-03-19 14:31                   ` Eric Botcazou
2004-03-19 19:29                     ` Mark Mitchell
2004-03-19 20:04                       ` Eric Botcazou
2004-03-19 20:23                         ` Mark Mitchell
2004-03-20 19:51                           ` Eric Botcazou
     [not found]                 ` <405A3F26.2050100@codesourcery.com>
     [not found]                   ` <200403190155.18981.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
2004-03-19  6:42                     ` Mark Mitchell
2004-03-16  2:09 ` C++ status (Was: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)) Giovanni Bajo
2004-03-11 12:15 GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Richard Kenner
2004-03-11 12:39 ` Eric Botcazou
2004-03-11 12:49 Richard Kenner
2004-03-11 14:09 ` Eric Botcazou
2004-03-19  6:34 Richard Kenner
2004-03-19 12:18 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-03-19 14:22 Richard Kenner
2004-03-19 20:08 Richard Kenner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200403091809.i29I9P04020607@sirius.codesourcery.com \
    --to=mark@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).