public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>,
	mark@codesourcery.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 21:11:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040311211118.GA15754@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040311103911.GF3822@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>

On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 11:39:11AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> BTW, there is one optimization which we perhaps could do.  People often
> write:
> void foo (void)
> {
>   const char bar[16] = { 0x80 };
>   baz (bar);
> }
> which could be optimized into:
> void foo (void)
> {
>   static const char bar[16] = { 0x80 };
>   baz (bar);
> }
> 
> Then we can get rid of the runtime initialization altogether.
> This could be done either if the whole aggregate is const, or if all fields
> are const.

This does indeed happen on tree-ssa branch if the whole aggregate
is const.


r~

  reply	other threads:[~2004-03-11 21:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-09 18:09 Mark Mitchell
2004-03-11  9:45 ` Eric Botcazou
2004-03-11 12:48   ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-03-11 21:11     ` Richard Henderson [this message]
2004-03-16 16:53   ` Mark Mitchell
2004-03-16 16:59     ` Paul Koning
2004-03-16 17:11       ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-03-16 17:24         ` Zack Weinberg
2004-03-16 17:25           ` Paul Koning
2004-03-17 10:56     ` Eric Botcazou
2004-03-17 11:49       ` Eric Botcazou
2004-03-17 15:55       ` Mark Mitchell
2004-03-18  8:25         ` Eric Botcazou
2004-03-18 18:31           ` Eric Botcazou
2004-03-18 19:15             ` Mark Mitchell
2004-03-18 23:36               ` Eric Botcazou
2004-03-18 23:41                 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-03-19  1:23                   ` Eric Botcazou
2004-03-19 14:31                   ` Eric Botcazou
2004-03-19 19:29                     ` Mark Mitchell
2004-03-19 20:04                       ` Eric Botcazou
2004-03-19 20:23                         ` Mark Mitchell
2004-03-20 19:51                           ` Eric Botcazou
     [not found]                 ` <405A3F26.2050100@codesourcery.com>
     [not found]                   ` <200403190155.18981.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
2004-03-19  6:42                     ` Mark Mitchell
2004-03-16  2:09 ` C++ status (Was: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)) Giovanni Bajo
2004-03-11 12:15 GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Richard Kenner
2004-03-11 12:39 ` Eric Botcazou
2004-03-11 12:49 Richard Kenner
2004-03-11 14:09 ` Eric Botcazou
2004-03-19  6:34 Richard Kenner
2004-03-19 12:18 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-03-19 14:22 Richard Kenner
2004-03-19 20:08 Richard Kenner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040311211118.GA15754@redhat.com \
    --to=rth@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=mark@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).