From: Joe Buck <Joe.Buck@synopsys.COM>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@wasabisystems.com>
Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>,
stl@caltech.edu, "'GCC'" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 17:52:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040315095247.C3175@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m31xnuhvfp.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>; from ian@wasabisystems.com on Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 12:27:54PM -0500
Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> writes:
> > They are no more than C libraries are tied to compilers. In fact, in
> > the old days, libg++ used to come in a separate package. More to the
> > point, you have a huge amount of C++ libraries out there that are no
> > more tied to the details of compilers.
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 12:27:54PM -0500, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> OK, noted.
>
> Should we spin off libstdc++-v3? Why or why not?
As the saying goes, if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Our current C++
development process seems to be working well; there are still more bugs
than I'd like, but we are making huge progress.
> libg++ was distributed separately, but my recollection is that it was
> pretty closely tied to the g++ release cycle. After all, g++ used to
> be released separately too, but that didn't mean that it wasn't
> closely tied to gcc.
The old libg++ model allowed for looser coupling: bug fix versions of
libg++ could be released at a different pace than bug fix versions of the
compiler, but the first two digits of version numbers had to match.
This gave the ability to release bug fixes for one without doing a new
release of the other.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-15 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-15 3:19 Stephan T. Lavavej
2004-03-15 3:29 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-03-15 12:40 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2004-03-15 12:53 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-03-15 13:37 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2004-03-16 0:37 ` libstdc++ (was Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!) Kevin Atkinson
2004-03-15 15:11 ` GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Ian Lance Taylor
2004-03-15 16:25 ` Stephan T. Lavavej
2004-03-15 16:40 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-03-15 16:46 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-03-15 16:56 ` Paolo Carlini
2004-03-15 17:10 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-03-15 17:15 ` Paolo Carlini
2004-03-15 17:58 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-03-15 16:59 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-03-15 17:28 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-03-15 17:47 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-03-15 17:52 ` Joe Buck [this message]
2004-03-15 17:53 ` Phil Edwards
2004-03-15 17:45 ` Joe Buck
2004-03-15 19:50 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2004-03-16 1:00 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-03-17 0:07 ` Kai Henningsen
2004-03-16 23:12 ` Kai Henningsen
2004-03-17 3:00 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-03-15 17:42 ` Joe Buck
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-17 0:31 Stephan T. Lavavej
2004-03-17 3:30 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-03-14 23:40 Scott Robert Ladd
2004-03-14 23:49 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-03-15 1:47 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2004-03-15 0:11 ` Paolo Carlini
2004-03-15 1:47 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2004-03-15 2:07 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-03-15 2:30 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2004-03-15 2:31 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-03-15 2:38 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2004-03-15 10:00 ` Sebastian Pop
2004-03-15 1:55 ` Roger Sayle
2004-03-15 2:22 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2004-03-15 12:05 ` Stelios Xanthakis
2004-03-15 18:22 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2004-03-15 2:41 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2004-03-15 3:05 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-03-15 14:47 ` Segher Boessenkool
2004-03-15 17:44 ` Geert Bosch
2004-03-15 17:46 ` Geert Bosch
2004-03-15 2:41 ` Kaveh R. Ghazi
2004-03-15 6:06 ` Andreas Jaeger
2004-03-15 8:57 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-03-15 3:01 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-03-15 4:06 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2004-03-15 5:15 ` James Morrison
2004-03-15 8:20 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-03-15 18:13 ` Joe Buck
2004-03-16 13:31 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-03-15 7:42 ` Ranjit Mathew
2004-03-15 19:00 ` Toon Moene
2004-03-15 19:44 ` Laurent GUERBY
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040315095247.C3175@synopsys.com \
--to=joe.buck@synopsys.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gdr@integrable-solutions.net \
--cc=ian@wasabisystems.com \
--cc=stl@caltech.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).