From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28768 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2004 06:54:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22156 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2004 06:52:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO monty-python.gnu.org) (199.232.76.173) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Mar 2004 06:52:44 -0000 Received: from [66.187.237.200] (helo=frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.30) id 1B38Qi-0005en-FY for gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 01:52:00 -0500 Received: from frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2G6ojIS006184; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 22:50:45 -0800 Received: (from rth@localhost) by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2G6ojCE006182; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 22:50:45 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 06:54:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Robert Dewar Cc: alexr@spies.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Message-ID: <20040316065045.GA6176@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , Robert Dewar , alexr@spies.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <20040316053348.000A2F2DB4@nile.gnat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040316053348.000A2F2DB4@nile.gnat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00781.txt.bz2 On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 12:33:48AM -0500, Robert Dewar wrote: > Yes, but they are not required to work, so the fact that they happen to > work is not a legitimate reason to avoid optimization. I might possibly agree to that for C99 (since there is a standardized way to accomplish the stated goal), but not for C89. r~