From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>,
gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 23:41:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040318233552.GI31589@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200403190031.22113.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 12:36:33AM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > How about the idea above of just zeroing the holes?
>
> If you're fine with the blockage approach...
Can't we at least detect the case where either the whole aggregate
is const or all its fields are const? Then we don't need any blockage.
Jakub
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-18 23:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-09 18:09 Mark Mitchell
2004-03-11 9:45 ` Eric Botcazou
2004-03-11 12:48 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-03-11 21:11 ` Richard Henderson
2004-03-16 16:53 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-03-16 16:59 ` Paul Koning
2004-03-16 17:11 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2004-03-16 17:24 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-03-16 17:25 ` Paul Koning
2004-03-17 10:56 ` Eric Botcazou
2004-03-17 11:49 ` Eric Botcazou
2004-03-17 15:55 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-03-18 8:25 ` Eric Botcazou
2004-03-18 18:31 ` Eric Botcazou
2004-03-18 19:15 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-03-18 23:36 ` Eric Botcazou
2004-03-18 23:41 ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2004-03-19 1:23 ` Eric Botcazou
2004-03-19 14:31 ` Eric Botcazou
2004-03-19 19:29 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-03-19 20:04 ` Eric Botcazou
2004-03-19 20:23 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-03-20 19:51 ` Eric Botcazou
[not found] ` <405A3F26.2050100@codesourcery.com>
[not found] ` <200403190155.18981.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
2004-03-19 6:42 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-03-16 2:09 ` C++ status (Was: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)) Giovanni Bajo
2004-03-11 12:15 GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Richard Kenner
2004-03-11 12:39 ` Eric Botcazou
2004-03-11 12:49 Richard Kenner
2004-03-11 14:09 ` Eric Botcazou
2004-03-19 6:34 Richard Kenner
2004-03-19 12:18 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-03-19 14:22 Richard Kenner
2004-03-19 20:08 Richard Kenner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040318233552.GI31589@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
--to=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=mark@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).