From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6852 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2004 23:36:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6579 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2004 23:36:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Mar 2004 23:36:08 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2INa74b029734; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 18:36:07 -0500 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (devserv.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.1]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i2INa7j32752; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 18:36:07 -0500 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2INZr1n005064; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 18:35:53 -0500 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2INZrxn005062; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 18:35:53 -0500 Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 23:41:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Eric Botcazou Cc: Mark Mitchell , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Message-ID: <20040318233552.GI31589@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <200403091809.i29I9P04020607@sirius.codesourcery.com> <200403181927.00513.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <4059EE8A.4060407@codesourcery.com> <200403190031.22113.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200403190031.22113.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg01093.txt.bz2 On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 12:36:33AM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote: > > How about the idea above of just zeroing the holes? > > If you're fine with the blockage approach... Can't we at least detect the case where either the whole aggregate is const or all its fields are const? Then we don't need any blockage. Jakub