From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-93015-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 29489 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2004 23:58:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 29408 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2004 23:58:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.libertysurf.net) (213.36.80.91)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Mar 2004 23:58:28 -0000
Received: from localhost.localdomain (212.129.22.31) by mail.libertysurf.net (6.5.036)
        id 4059C8D3000C46BB; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:58:19 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 01:23:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>,
 gcc@gcc.gnu.org,
 gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
References: <200403091809.i29I9P04020607@sirius.codesourcery.com> <200403190031.22113.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <20040318233552.GI31589@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040318233552.GI31589@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <200403190105.32751.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg01096.txt.bz2

> Can't we at least detect the case where either the whole aggregate
> is const or all its fields are const?  Then we don't need any blockage.

So we endorse the double /u liberality?

-- 
Eric Botcazou