From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-93071-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8491 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2004 17:02:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8484 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2004 17:02:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.uk.superh.com) (193.128.105.170)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Mar 2004 17:02:05 -0000
Received: from sh-uk-ex01.uk.w2k.superh.com (sh-uk-ex01 [192.168.16.17])
	by smtp.uk.superh.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2JH22Lb027119;
	Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:02:03 GMT
Received: from linsvr1.uk.superh.com ([192.168.16.50]) by sh-uk-ex01.uk.w2k.superh.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
	 Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:03:40 +0000
Received: (from renneckej@localhost)
	by linsvr1.uk.superh.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i2JH22p13715;
	Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:02:02 GMT
From: Joern Rennecke <joern.rennecke@superh.com>
Message-Id: <200403191702.i2JH22p13715@linsvr1.uk.superh.com>
Subject: Re: How can INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET be made correct?
To: dk@artimi.com (Dave Korn)
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:31:00 -0000
Cc: joern.rennecke@superh.com ('Joern Rennecke'), gcc@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <NUTMEGFRaqbC8wSA1Xv000001ba@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM> from "Dave Korn" at Mar 19, 2004 04:46:44 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Mar 2004 17:03:40.0764 (UTC) FILETIME=[20CB51C0:01C40DD4]
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.41
X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg01152.txt.bz2

> There is no ELIMINABLE_REGS definition, but FRAME_POINTER_REQUIRED is zero
> so gcc can do its default eliminate-lr-vs-sp.

Are you saying here that LINK_REGNUM is the same as FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM?