From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2721 invoked by alias); 21 Mar 2004 20:30:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2714 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2004 20:30:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx2.ngi.de) (213.191.74.84) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Mar 2004 20:30:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 12448 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2004 20:02:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rz.zidlicky.org) ([217.185.119.248]) (envelope-sender ) by 0 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 21 Mar 2004 20:02:21 -0000 Received: by rz.zidlicky.org (Postfix, from userid 511) id AE83E70CA2; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 21:16:36 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 01:27:00 -0000 From: Richard Zidlicky To: Bernardo Innocenti Cc: GCC Mailing List , Gunther Nikl , Jim Wilson Subject: Re: m68k-linux regressions Message-ID: <20040321201636.GA1186@linux-m68k.org> References: <405BBE7B.4000904@develer.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <405BBE7B.4000904@develer.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg01270.txt.bz2 On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 04:46:03AM +0100, Bernardo Innocenti wrote: > Hello, > > I've finally finished running the C and C++ test suites on > the m68k-linux box kindly offered by the Debian people. > > I've posted the results here: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-03/msg01015.html > > The number of failures might look high, but it's much better > than I what I got from my previous tests in January (>170 > failures on m68k-netbsd!). lot of the failures may not be failures, too small timeout for m68k. > --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-sjlj-exceptions --enable-clocale=gnu why sjlj exceptions? Is something terribly broken with the other exception model? Richard