From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30368 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2004 07:43:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30360 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2004 07:43:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.libertysurf.net) (213.36.80.91) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Mar 2004 07:43:41 -0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (212.129.22.125) by mail.libertysurf.net (6.5.036) id 4059CC450066336E; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 08:43:39 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Eric Botcazou To: ja2morri@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (James Morrison) Subject: Re: sparc (vis?) tests: 20001013-1, 20001101-1, 20001102-1 Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 14:19:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: <20040320204131.1A20D10B6F8@perpugilliam.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> In-Reply-To: <20040320204131.1A20D10B6F8@perpugilliam.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200403220849.41259.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg01289.txt.bz2 > I'm looking at the testcases gcc.dg/2000{1013-1,1101-1,1102-1} which > all only run on sparcv9 or sparc64. However, the assembly for the tests > has very little difference between compiling the tests with -mv8plus -mvis > and -mcpu=ultrasparc -mvis. The differences are attached. I'm not > exactly sure if this will work on Solaris, especially old versions, but I > think it will. Yes, this works on Solaris 2.5.1 too, which is the oldest version we support. I suppose we can remove the sparc64-*-* marker and run them on sparc*-*-* with -mcpu=ultrasparc -mvis -mv8plus. Yes, this does assume that we run on Sun UltraSPARC and up, but this assumption is already made in some of the gcc.dg/ultrasp* testcases. -- Eric Botcazou