From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7908 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2004 16:33:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7892 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2004 16:33:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Mar 2004 16:33:28 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2MGXOWA011683; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 11:33:24 -0500 Received: from speedy.slc.redhat.com (vpn50-43.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.43]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i2MGXNj11536; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 11:33:23 -0500 Received: from redhat.com (law@localhost) by speedy.slc.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i2MGX9KX022060; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:33:10 -0700 Message-Id: <200403221633.i2MGX9KX022060@speedy.slc.redhat.com> X-Authentication-Warning: speedy.slc.redhat.com: law owned process doing -bs To: Diego Novillo cc: Richard Kenner , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Reply-To: law@redhat.com Subject: Re: Tree flags vs. tree-ssa merge In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 22 Mar 2004 10:22:54 EST." <1079968973.31835.62.camel@localhost.localdomain> From: law@redhat.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 18:33:00 -0000 X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg01306.txt.bz2 In message <1079968973.31835.62.camel@localhost.localdomain>, Diego Novillo wri tes: >On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 09:01, Richard Kenner wrote: > >> This needs to be cleaned up and I'm willing to do it but would like to know >> if doing so will disrupt the tree-ssa merge process. >> >It probably will, because we have several modifications in tree.h. >Would you be willing to apply your patch to tree-ssa at the same time? True, but I don't recall us stealing those bits for anything -- largely because the usage of those flags is a bloody mess. I'd rather see the work go in and tree-ssa deal with the consequences (which I really don't think will be major). jeff