From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14575 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2004 12:03:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14559 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2004 12:03:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gizmo09ps.bigpond.com) (144.140.71.19) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Mar 2004 12:03:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 20579 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2004 11:56:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO psmam11.bigpond.com) (144.135.25.100) by gizmo09ps.bigpond.com with SMTP; 25 Mar 2004 11:56:33 -0000 Received: from cpe-138-130-71-233.nsw.bigpond.net.au ([138.130.71.233]) by psmam11.bigpond.com(MAM REL_3_4_2 219/7804895) with SMTP id 7804895; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 22:03:12 +1000 Received: by bonnie.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 500) id BBA74855A; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 23:03:08 +1100 Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:29:00 -0000 From: Chris Proctor To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64? Message-ID: <20040325120308.GA20121@bonnie.vic.bigpond.net.au> References: <20040324225404.GA12176@lucon.org> <20040325080254.GA6150@bonnie.vic.bigpond.net.au> <20040325094551.A29279@dublin.act-europe.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040325094551.A29279@dublin.act-europe.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg01460.txt.bz2 On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 09:45:51AM +0100, Arnaud Charlet wrote: > > Change looks good to me, I'd probably consider integrating it. > > Laurent, could you give some figures on the time impact of such a > change ? Maybe 0.01 would be a sufficient compromise ? > I tried 0.01 but still basicly got the same intermittant failures. My system is a linux SMP dual-1Ghz PIII. The load is two mersene prime calculations in the background, plus the load from testing and any other random processes running. I haven't looked lately, but I dont remember this constant being used in a lot of test cases, but I could be mistaken. -- Chris Proctor.