* It it OK to use inline functions in GCC itself?
@ 2004-03-25 6:40 Kazu Hirata
2004-03-25 19:51 ` Richard Henderson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kazu Hirata @ 2004-03-25 6:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc
Hi,
It it OK to use inline functions in GCC itself? I am guessing the
answer is yes given tree-flow.h from tree-ssa.
I just came across an idea of making RTL_CHECK* inline functions so
that when I preprocess GCC source files, they won't get too messy.
Kazu Hirat
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: It it OK to use inline functions in GCC itself?
2004-03-25 6:40 It it OK to use inline functions in GCC itself? Kazu Hirata
@ 2004-03-25 19:51 ` Richard Henderson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2004-03-25 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kazu Hirata; +Cc: gcc
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 12:33:43AM -0500, Kazu Hirata wrote:
> It it OK to use inline functions in GCC itself? I am guessing the
> answer is yes given tree-flow.h from tree-ssa.
Yes. inline expands to nothing if the compiler doesn't understand it.
r~
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-03-25 18:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-03-25 6:40 It it OK to use inline functions in GCC itself? Kazu Hirata
2004-03-25 19:51 ` Richard Henderson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).