public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
To: wilson@specifixinc.com
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: fixing vs WARN_CFLAGS vs cross builds
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 06:40:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200403310143.i2V1hFA0014438@greed.delorie.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <406A1FA1.1090602@specifixinc.com> (message from Jim Wilson on Tue, 30 Mar 2004 17:32:17 -0800)


> The gcc Makefile does not directly call "gcc" anywhere.  From a brief 
> glance, I think you mean CC_FOR_BUILD, which you have set to gcc.

Yes.

> It isn't exactly clear why you have a problem though.  WARN_CFLAGS is 
> set for a stage1 build only if the build (host?) compiler is gcc, and 
> your compiler is gcc, so why is there a problem?  Is there a particular 
> option which is the problem?  If so, which one?  Is this a versioning 
> problem?  I.e. an option is in WARN_CFLAGS that is not supported by an 
> old gcc version you are using for the bootstrap?

Yes.  BUILD_CC is 3.2.3, and does not support these:

cc1: unrecognized option `-Wno-variadic-macros'
cc1: unrecognized option `-Wold-style-definition'

> It may be reasonable to remove the WARN_CFLAGS setting in the fixinc.sh 
> rule.  We don't use WARN_CFLAGS anyplace else where we use CC_FOR_BUILD. 
>   This can work in stage2 etc builds, but this is probably not important 
> enough to worry about.
> 
> It would be nice to have a proper bug report though.

I was still trying to figure out what was supposed to happen from a
theoretical standpoint.  

I have a patch which tests for build!=host and disables WARN_CFLAGS,
but should fixinc *ever* be built with WARN_CFLAGS?

  reply	other threads:[~2004-03-31  1:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-30  0:29 DJ Delorie
2004-03-31  6:38 ` Jim Wilson
2004-03-31  6:40   ` DJ Delorie [this message]
2004-03-31  7:53     ` Jim Wilson
2004-03-31  7:55       ` DJ Delorie
2004-03-31  8:09         ` Jim Wilson
2004-03-31  8:03 Nathanael Nerode
2004-03-31 10:52 ` Jim Wilson
2004-03-31 12:43   ` Zack Weinberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200403310143.i2V1hFA0014438@greed.delorie.com \
    --to=dj@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=wilson@specifixinc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).