From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19011 invoked by alias); 31 Mar 2004 08:46:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18996 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2004 08:46:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.libertysurf.net) (213.36.80.91) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 31 Mar 2004 08:46:40 -0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (213.36.36.65) by mail.libertysurf.net (6.5.036) id 406451FE00934F00; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:46:07 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Eric Botcazou To: Daniel Berlin Subject: Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:24:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 Cc: Joe Buck , Wolfgang Bangerth , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Gabriel Dos Reis References: <200403291410.59630.bangerth@ices.utexas.edu> <200403302318.49872.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200403311045.33026.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg01754.txt.bz2 > He also backported a patch from the future, which is odd. I changed the date because it didn't match that of the patch on mainline and 3.4 branch, which is confusing when you track regressions. But the patch had indeed been "backported" before it was applied on mainline and 3.4 branch. -- Eric Botcazou