From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-95142-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 2986 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2004 03:36:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 2970 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2004 03:36:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Apr 2004 03:36:09 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3U3a9KG024396
	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 23:36:09 -0400
Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i3U3a9v14353
	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 23:36:09 -0400
Received: from frogsleap.quesejoda.com (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221])
	by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i3U3a8V2018687
	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 23:36:08 -0400
Received: by frogsleap.quesejoda.com (Postfix, from userid 500)
	id 4FEBC3BC93; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 23:36:08 -0400 (AST)
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 07:28:00 -0000
From: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: does anyone use --enable-altivec?
Message-ID: <20040430033608.GA9978@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg01432.txt.bz2

Does anyone use this option?

It's undocumented, and was only added as a temporary kludge while the
original AltiVec support was being added.

Does anyone care if I deprecate it?
Better yet, does anyone care if I remove it?

Aldy