From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-101590-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23848 invoked by alias); 30 Aug 2004 11:24:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23841 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2004 11:24:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz) (195.113.15.26)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 30 Aug 2004 11:24:12 -0000
Received: from sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz (sunsite.mff.cuni.cz [127.0.0.1])
	by sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i7U96N3j015080;
	Mon, 30 Aug 2004 11:06:23 +0200
Received: (from jakub@localhost)
	by sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i7U96Mtw015078;
	Mon, 30 Aug 2004 11:06:22 +0200
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 13:05:00 -0000
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Laurent GUERBY <laurent@guerby.net>
Cc: Richard Kenner <kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>, neroden@fastmail.fm,
   gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
Message-ID: <20040830090622.GD30497@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>
Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
References: <10408301022.AA24170@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <1093863754.17130.27.camel@pc.site>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1093863754.17130.27.camel@pc.site>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg01480.txt.bz2

On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 01:02:34PM +0200, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 12:22, Richard Kenner wrote:
> > >    Is Ada functioning a requirement for the release?  If so it seems a
> > >    moderately bad idea to go into stage 3 with it totally busted.
> > 
> > The answer to the first question has always been "no".  But in practice,
> > my expectation is that it will work fine on the release.
> 
> We had a barely working Ada compiler in 3.3 (fortunately enough for
> bootstraping 3.4 and 3.5 on x86 and x86_64), a fully working compiler on
> 3.4 (100% pass on x86 at -O0) and it looks like 3.5 will have 100% pass

Well, fully working on x86, not working in 3.4 on 64-bit architectures
and not working on ppc32 (while it worked in 3.3 on all of them).

	Jakub