public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
To: Steven Bosscher <stevenb@suse.de>
Cc: Giovanni Bajo <giovannibajo@libero.it>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 16:34:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040830151240.GD22834@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200408301217.06743.stevenb@suse.de>

> On Monday 30 August 2004 12:04, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> > Thanks for the update. Do you think it is feasable to have a special
> > version of DCE/CCP (or a special flag in them) so that they don't destroy
> > user variables, to be used at -O0?
> 
> We discussed that, yes.  You could look into how CCP propagates
> things like addresses and so on, and figure out other things that
> cause us to lose the user's variable.
> DCE is not a real problem.  If CCP would just not turn so many
> statements into dead code, it would work ;-)

I think all we need is to avoid CCP on user variables so user can change
their value and DCE killing whole statements so user can breakpoint.
Perhaps we can even consider idea of passing down the NOPs for
statements that have completely no effect.  This should be embeddable
into existing CCP/DCE code... perhaps ;)

Honza
> 
> Gr.
> Steven
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-30 15:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-29 23:49 Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30  0:03 ` Andrew Pinski
2004-08-30  0:33   ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30  0:53     ` Daniel Berlin
2004-08-30  0:25 ` Steven Bosscher
2004-08-30  0:48   ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30  0:57     ` Steven Bosscher
2004-08-30  1:04       ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30  1:12         ` Andrew Pinski
2004-08-30  1:29           ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 10:11           ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-08-30  2:46         ` Giovanni Bajo
2004-08-30  3:09           ` Matt Austern
2004-08-30 13:51             ` Speeding up C++ at -O0 (Was: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29)) Giovanni Bajo
2004-08-30 18:02             ` GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29) Joe Buck
2004-08-30  3:32           ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-08-30  4:11             ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30  4:17               ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-08-30  4:43                 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30  5:09                   ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-08-30  5:27                     ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30  5:30                       ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-08-30  6:57                         ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30  9:24           ` Steven Bosscher
2004-08-30 10:13             ` Giovanni Bajo
2004-08-30 10:26               ` Steven Bosscher
2004-08-30 16:34                 ` Jan Hubicka [this message]
2004-08-30 11:02           ` Paolo Bonzini
2004-08-30 10:03         ` Steven Bosscher
2004-08-30 15:11           ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 15:21           ` Jan Hubicka
2004-08-30 17:46           ` Jeffrey A Law
2004-08-30  1:09       ` Daniel Berlin
2004-08-30  1:53         ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30  7:34           ` Steven Bosscher
2004-08-30  8:15             ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 14:16               ` Daniel Berlin
2004-08-30 15:10                 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30  3:03 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-08-30  3:20   ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-31 17:35   ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-08-30 10:50 ` Dorit Naishlos
2004-08-30 15:12   ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 14:26 ` Jan Hubicka
2004-08-30 15:03   ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 15:05     ` Jan Hubicka
2004-08-30 17:08 ` Diego Novillo
2004-08-31  3:25 ` Devang Patel
2004-08-30  0:59 Richard Kenner
2004-08-30  4:33 Nathanael Nerode
2004-08-30 10:17 Richard Kenner
2004-08-30 14:48 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-08-30 18:08   ` Mike Stump
2004-08-30 10:44 Richard Kenner
2004-08-30 11:27 ` Laurent GUERBY
2004-08-30 13:05   ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-08-30 18:28     ` Laurent GUERBY
2004-08-30 20:04       ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-08-30 20:25         ` Laurent GUERBY
2004-08-31  5:27           ` Eric Botcazou
2004-08-31  9:42           ` Arnaud Charlet
2004-08-30 20:14       ` Florian Weimer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040830151240.GD22834@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
    --to=hubicka@ucw.cz \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=giovannibajo@libero.it \
    --cc=stevenb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).