From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-101992-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 9485 invoked by alias); 4 Sep 2004 02:42:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9472 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2004 02:42:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 4 Sep 2004 02:42:08 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i842g2S0015259;
	Fri, 3 Sep 2004 22:42:07 -0400
Received: from post-office.corp.redhat.com (post-office.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.227])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i842g2312917;
	Fri, 3 Sep 2004 22:42:02 -0400
Received: from greed.delorie.com (dj.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.0.222])
	by post-office.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i842g2w23316;
	Fri, 3 Sep 2004 22:42:02 -0400
Received: from greed.delorie.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by greed.delorie.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i842g1UU003647;
	Fri, 3 Sep 2004 22:42:01 -0400
Received: (from dj@localhost)
	by greed.delorie.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i842g1O4003643;
	Fri, 3 Sep 2004 22:42:01 -0400
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 02:42:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200409040242.i842g1O4003643@greed.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
To: amylaar@spamcop.net
CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
In-reply-to: <20040904033354.3E9F8DD7FE@meolyon.local> (amylaar@spamcop.net)
Subject: Re: sh64 and mulilibs
References:  <20040904033354.3E9F8DD7FE@meolyon.local>
X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00179.txt.bz2


> ../srcw/configure --target=sh64-elf --with-headers --with-newlib --disable-gdb

No, this doesn't work for me.  I get the -ml multilib and nothing
else.  How can it work?  t-mlib-sh5-compact, for example, defines:

ML_sh5_compact=m5-compact/

but t-sh64 has $(ML_m5_compact:m5_compact=compact) so it will never
see a set value.

Are you sure you don't have any local changes?

> > * How are the C++ test results?
> 
> See:
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-09/msg00085.html

1) I can't even build newlib because cc1 segfaults in
   sh_gimplify_va_arg (I sent mail to rth about it).

2) Your results don't have any pic/PIC multilibs.  Do they work?