From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20970 invoked by alias); 7 Sep 2004 20:03:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20952 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2004 20:03:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 7 Sep 2004 20:03:19 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i87K2Xl3018420; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 16:02:33 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i87K31701276; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 16:03:02 -0400 Received: from frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.27]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i87K31V23841; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 13:03:01 -0700 Received: from frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i87K31Oo030689; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 13:03:01 -0700 Received: (from rth@localhost) by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i87K31iZ030687; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 13:03:01 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 20:03:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Daniel Berlin Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Why is the TREE_PURPOSE of a CONSTRUCTOR_ELT list for ARRAY_TYPE NULL? Message-ID: <20040907200301.GA30635@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , Daniel Berlin , gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <1094500549.13790.4.camel@dberlin.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1094500549.13790.4.camel@dberlin.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00318.txt.bz2 On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 03:55:49PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote: > Does that mean that the corresponding index is the last index + 1? Yes. > In any case, is this a documentation bug, or a C++ FE bug (IE should i > expect tree_purpose to always be there, and it's just not getting set in > the case of the C vtables, or do the docs need updating)? We should probably change the vtable builder to fill in the values. r~