From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-102366-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7085 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2004 00:00:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7034 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2004 00:00:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO rwcrmhc11.comcast.net) (204.127.198.35)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 10 Sep 2004 00:00:27 -0000
Received: from lucon.org ([24.6.212.230]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP
          id <20040910000027013004scpde>; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 00:00:27 +0000
Received: by lucon.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 027C563F4E; Thu,  9 Sep 2004 17:00:27 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 00:22:00 -0000
From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Redundant instructions in loop optimization for x86-64?
Message-ID: <20040910000026.GA25099@lucon.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00553.txt.bz2

It seems that gcc 3.4 and 4.0 generate redundant instructions in loop
optimization for x86-64:

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17387

Does anyone know why?


H.J.