* [RFC] fixing libstdc++/10606
@ 2004-09-13 0:12 Richard Henderson
2004-09-13 3:14 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-09-13 17:52 ` Benjamin Kosnik
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2004-09-13 0:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libstdc++, gcc
This is an ABI related bug that's been on my plate for forever.
A nice round number like 4.0 does seem to be the right place to
fix it, if we're going to do it at all.
Does anyone have any comments wrt the proposal in comment 3?
r~
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC] fixing libstdc++/10606
2004-09-13 0:12 [RFC] fixing libstdc++/10606 Richard Henderson
@ 2004-09-13 3:14 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-09-13 17:52 ` Benjamin Kosnik
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Gabriel Dos Reis @ 2004-09-13 3:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Henderson; +Cc: libstdc++, gcc
Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:
| This is an ABI related bug that's been on my plate for forever.
| A nice round number like 4.0 does seem to be the right place to
| fix it, if we're going to do it at all.
|
| Does anyone have any comments wrt the proposal in comment 3?
That proposal is OK with me. Jason seems to agree too.
-- Gaby
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC] fixing libstdc++/10606
2004-09-13 0:12 [RFC] fixing libstdc++/10606 Richard Henderson
2004-09-13 3:14 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
@ 2004-09-13 17:52 ` Benjamin Kosnik
2004-09-13 20:17 ` Mark Mitchell
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Kosnik @ 2004-09-13 17:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Henderson; +Cc: libstdc++, gcc
Fixing this would be welcome indeed.
It would be nice if uncaught_exception accurately reflected in-flight
exceptions. I don't see how you can do this robustly without
incrementing in cxa_rethrow as Jason suggests.
-benjamin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC] fixing libstdc++/10606
2004-09-13 17:52 ` Benjamin Kosnik
@ 2004-09-13 20:17 ` Mark Mitchell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mark Mitchell @ 2004-09-13 20:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Benjamin Kosnik; +Cc: Richard Henderson, libstdc++, gcc
Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>Fixing this would be welcome indeed.
>
>It would be nice if uncaught_exception accurately reflected in-flight
>exceptions. I don't see how you can do this robustly without
>incrementing in cxa_rethrow as Jason suggests.
>
>
I, too, agree with the analysis in the PR.
Richard, would you mind posting a patch to the IA64 ABI specification to
the cxx-abi-dev@codesourcery.com?
I'd like to get the addition incorporated into the EH stuff in the
quasi-offficial version of the spec.
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
(916) 791-8304
mark@codesourcery.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-09-13 19:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-09-13 0:12 [RFC] fixing libstdc++/10606 Richard Henderson
2004-09-13 3:14 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-09-13 17:52 ` Benjamin Kosnik
2004-09-13 20:17 ` Mark Mitchell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).