From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15195 invoked by alias); 16 Sep 2004 23:26:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15187 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2004 23:26:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO av13-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net) (81.228.10.104) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 Sep 2004 23:26:26 -0000 Received: by av13-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id BF0B337E47; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 01:26:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp4-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (smtp4-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net [81.228.10.180]) by av13-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B256A37E45 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 01:26:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from falcon.midgard.homeip.net (h201n1fls24o1048.bredband.comhem.se [212.181.162.201]) by smtp4-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 8646837E42 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 01:26:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 81188 invoked by uid 1001); 16 Sep 2004 23:26:25 -0000 Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 01:27:00 -0000 From: Erik Trulsson To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Serious problems with tree-ssa operand handling Message-ID: <20040916232624.GA81147@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <10409161326.AA03462@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <9GygsOKXw-B@khms.westfalen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9GygsOKXw-B@khms.westfalen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg01032.txt.bz2 On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 07:55:00PM +0200, Kai Henningsen wrote: > kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) wrote on 16.09.04 in <10409161326.AA03462@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>: > > > What exactly is the build problem you are running into? > > > > It was a few months ago. Each version had a different problem. Mostly > > missing macros.a > > > > nail is derived from berkeley mail, so it shouldn't be too unportable. > > > > I know. That's what I thought and SunOS 4.1.4 is pretty much a vanilla > > 4.3bsd, so I was quite surprised. > > Well, I have no idea if this helps, but the FreeBSD CVS does contain a > version tagged bsd_44_lite. That *should* be close - but you never know. Likely to be large differences. 4.3BSD was originally released in 1986. 4.4BSD-Lite was released in 1994 (after the legal problems with AT&T had been resolved.) There was quite a bit of development done between 4.3BSD and 4.4BSD. Some old BSD releases can be found at ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/unix The original 4.3BSD doesn't seem to be there but 4.3BSD-Reno is. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se