* mainline libstdc++ failures, one week old
@ 2004-09-08 16:48 Benjamin Kosnik
2004-09-08 16:57 ` Andrew Pinski
2004-09-11 0:18 ` Mike Stump
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Kosnik @ 2004-09-08 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libstdc++; +Cc: gcc
This is just a heads up to libstdc++ developers.
Last known good snapshot of mainline with zero libstdc++ failures on
x86/linux or ppc/darwin is Sept 1 or 2, depending on your location and
pull date.
See:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-09/msg00059.html
vs.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-09/msg00292.html
So, things have been broken for some time.
Is there any effort at fixing this breakage? I do not see this as
library-related, but compiler related. Thoughts?
-benjamin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: mainline libstdc++ failures, one week old
2004-09-08 16:48 mainline libstdc++ failures, one week old Benjamin Kosnik
@ 2004-09-08 16:57 ` Andrew Pinski
2004-09-11 0:18 ` Mike Stump
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Pinski @ 2004-09-08 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Benjamin Kosnik; +Cc: libstdc++, gcc
On Sep 8, 2004, at 9:47 AM, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> This is just a heads up to libstdc++ developers.
>
> Last known good snapshot of mainline with zero libstdc++ failures on
> x86/linux or ppc/darwin is Sept 1 or 2, depending on your location and
> pull date.
>
> See:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-09/msg00059.html
> vs.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-09/msg00292.html
>
> So, things have been broken for some time.
>
> Is there any effort at fixing this breakage? I do not see this as
> library-related, but compiler related. Thoughts?
Yes see:
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2004-09/msg00008.html>
Which shows the 8 related C++ regressions which are the same
breakage as the libstdc++ ones.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: mainline libstdc++ failures, one week old
2004-09-08 16:48 mainline libstdc++ failures, one week old Benjamin Kosnik
2004-09-08 16:57 ` Andrew Pinski
@ 2004-09-11 0:18 ` Mike Stump
2004-09-17 18:15 ` Benjamin Kosnik
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mike Stump @ 2004-09-11 0:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Benjamin Kosnik; +Cc: libstdc++, gcc
On Wednesday, September 8, 2004, at 09:47 AM, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> This is just a heads up to libstdc++ developers.
>
> Last known good snapshot of mainline with zero libstdc++ failures on
> x86/linux or ppc/darwin is Sept 1 or 2, depending on your location and
> pull date.
I think this has just been fixed:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-09/msg01018.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-09-17 16:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-09-08 16:48 mainline libstdc++ failures, one week old Benjamin Kosnik
2004-09-08 16:57 ` Andrew Pinski
2004-09-11 0:18 ` Mike Stump
2004-09-17 18:15 ` Benjamin Kosnik
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).