From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22749 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2004 18:38:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22738 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2004 18:38:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO caip.rutgers.edu) (128.6.236.10) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 20 Sep 2004 18:38:08 -0000 Received: from caip.rutgers.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by caip.rutgers.edu (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i8KIc7cT019097; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:38:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from ghazi@localhost) by caip.rutgers.edu (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id i8KIc7g9019096; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:38:07 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 19:51:00 -0000 From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" Message-Id: <200409201838.i8KIc7g9019096@caip.rutgers.edu> To: echristo@redhat.com Subject: Re: Difference between {expand,fold,simplify}_builtin_foo ??? Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <200409201741.i8KHfi9u009853@caip.rutgers.edu> <1095702447.2934.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg01181.txt.bz2 > I've got a patch in the works that removes most of the simplify_* > routines. Some of them I've uh... folded... into fold_* and others > I'm doing what you said here. :) > I'll probably get back to it later today :) > -eric Great! I'd be happy to help, but to avoid stomping on the same code I'll avoid doing anything until I see what your patch catches. Thanks, --Kaveh -- Kaveh R. Ghazi ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu