From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28382 invoked by alias); 27 Sep 2004 20:58:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28373 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2004 20:58:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO roura.ac.upc.es) (147.83.33.10) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 27 Sep 2004 20:58:48 -0000 Received: from mora.ac.upc.es (mora.ac.upc.es [147.83.33.67]) by roura.ac.upc.es (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i8RKx5Qk008199; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 22:59:05 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from jbalart@localhost) by mora.ac.upc.es (8.12.8/8.12.8) id i8RKwknL021178; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 22:58:46 +0200 Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 23:03:00 -0000 From: Jairo Balart Tarzan To: peremolina@ya.com, OPEN64 -- Users/developers discuss/plan Open64 development Cc: "ipf-orc-support@sourceforge.net" , "open64-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" , "open64-user@lists.sourceforge.net" , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: [OPEN64] source to source compilers Message-ID: <20040927205846.GA21126@ac.upc.es> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg01543.txt.bz2 Of course! Totally necessary discussion and new compilers needed in my opinion. Jairo On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 08:57:56PM +0100, peremolina@ya.com wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm looking for people interested in source to source compilers. > I'd like to ear about people working on such tools and their > experiencies with the available compilers. I'd like to create a > discusion mailing list to talk about these aspects and find > people interested in developing a new source to source > infrastructure without all the problems that current compilers > presents in source to source tasks. > Any one interested? > > Of course, excuse-me if this is not the appropiate mailing list > to send this kind of message. > > Thanks, > Pere > > >