From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9069 invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2004 23:50:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9051 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2004 23:50:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 13 Nov 2004 23:50:36 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iADNoPLS021906; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 18:50:30 -0500 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iADNoPr02529; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 18:50:25 -0500 Received: from frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.27]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id iADNoNcv010707; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 18:50:23 -0500 Received: from frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iADNoM6P023429; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 15:50:22 -0800 Received: (from rth@localhost) by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iADNoMMJ023428; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 15:50:22 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 00:02:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Eric Botcazou Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Jan Hubicka Subject: Re: [cft] subreg validation patch Message-ID: <20041113235022.GA23417@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , Eric Botcazou , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Jan Hubicka References: <200411120930.37626.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <20041113225509.GA23203@redhat.com> <200411140047.13773.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200411140047.13773.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00466.txt.bz2 On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 12:48:05AM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote: > which breaks all the DFmode->SFmode splitters. Should we now create a double > subreg in this case? Why are you splitting these before reload? And post-reload these shouldn't create subregs, just new hard regs. r~