From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22144 invoked by alias); 17 Nov 2004 23:50:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21714 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2004 23:50:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO boden.synopsys.com) (198.182.44.79) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 17 Nov 2004 23:50:07 -0000 Received: from crone.synopsys.com (crone.synopsys.com [146.225.7.23]) by boden.synopsys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA94DA52; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:49:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from piper.synopsys.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by crone.synopsys.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA28514; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:50:06 -0800 (PST) Received: (from jbuck@localhost) by piper.synopsys.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id iAHNo5Z15150; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:50:05 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: piper.synopsys.com: jbuck set sender to Joe.Buck@synopsys.com using -f Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 00:06:00 -0000 From: Joe Buck To: Alex Perez Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, discuss-gnustep@gnu.org Subject: Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? Message-ID: <20041117155005.A14607@synopsys.com> References: <93CA0604-38E1-11D9-9815-0030654C2998@hamburg.de> <20041117224033.7788.qmail@web41601.mail.yahoo.com> <20041117230536.GA6006@disaster.jaj.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from aperez@student.santarosa.edu on Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 03:47:06PM -0800 X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00591.txt.bz2 On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 03:47:06PM -0800, Alex Perez wrote: > maybe you could actually be specific about what the concerns are instead > of spreading more FUD about the front-end changes. See Joseph Myers' article on this thread.