From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28555 invoked by alias); 17 Nov 2004 19:20:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28512 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2004 19:20:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.libertysurf.net) (213.36.80.91) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 17 Nov 2004 19:20:37 -0000 Received: from dyn-83-156-221-9.ppp.tiscali.fr (83.156.221.9) by mail.libertysurf.net (6.5.036) id 419AD82E0023E691; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:20:30 +0100 From: Eric Botcazou To: Richard Henderson Subject: Re: [cft] subreg validation round 2 Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 19:46:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <20041117184009.GA12257@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20041117184009.GA12257@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200411172021.21297.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00573.txt.bz2 > This passes on i686, alpha, ia64, powerpc linux, and sparc-solaris. > Given Ulrich's previous testing, it *ought* to pass on s390. Any > other takers before I check it in and have to pick up pieces after > the fact? How did you address the problem with SPARC splitters? -- Eric Botcazou