From: Gregory John Casamento <greg_casamento@yahoo.com>
To: Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf <lars.sonchocky-helldorf@hamburg.de>,
Mike Stump <mrs@apple.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 22:54:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041117224033.7788.qmail@web41601.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <93CA0604-38E1-11D9-9815-0030654C2998@hamburg.de>
Guys.. This type of outburst is atypical coming from me, but I must say
this...
Argh!! C'mon... c'mon... c'mon... ObjC++ has been perpetually forthcoming for
the past two years! What does it take to get Objective-C++ in? It has been
so frustrating waiting for this. There is *so much software* which would be
trivial to reuse once this is done.
Please, just get past all of the politics and get it in!
GJC
--- Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf <lars.sonchocky-helldorf@hamburg.de> wrote:
>
> Am Mittwoch, 17.11.04 um 21:26 Uhr schrieb Mike Stump:
>
> > On Nov 17, 2004, at 1:58 AM, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf wrote:
> >> I wanted to ask what the current status of Objective-C++ for mainline
> >> gcc is. While there have been a lot of activity on the gcc-patches
> >> and gcc-cvs lists several month ago it is now relatively silent
> >> regarding this topic. Is all the work done now or did the release
> >> plan slip backwards (to 4.1 or whatever)?
> >
> > Last I knew, everything was solidly wedged behind Geoff's objection
> > with no plan forward. The objection will either have to be withdrawn,
> > or Geoff will have to communicate his vision before any progress can
> > be made.
>
> What kind of objection was that? (you can give me a pointer to the
> archived mail at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/ or so)
>
> Would it be possible to ask Geoff to get down to business?
>
> >
> > I think this should be resolved now, as as we push it forward, it will
> > pass the drop dead date, and objective-c++ will have to be jettisoned
> > from gcc 4.0.0. :-(
> >
> > Mark, I suppose we can discuss when that drop dead date is. Has it
> > already passed?
>
> Hopefully not!
>
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss-gnustep mailing list
> > Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnustep mailing list
> Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
>
=====
Gregory John Casamento
-- CEO/President Open Logic Corp. (A Maryland Corporation)
#### Maintainer of Gorm for GNUstep.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-17 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-17 10:28 Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
2004-11-17 20:51 ` Mike Stump
2004-11-17 21:53 ` Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
2004-11-17 22:28 ` Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-17 22:54 ` Gregory John Casamento [this message]
2004-11-17 23:02 ` Nicolas Roard
2004-11-17 23:31 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-11-17 23:17 ` Phil Edwards
2004-11-17 23:50 ` Alex Perez
2004-11-18 0:06 ` Joe Buck
2004-11-18 0:35 ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-18 0:46 ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-18 0:53 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-11-18 1:18 ` Giovanni Bajo
2004-11-18 23:22 ` Geoffrey Keating
2004-11-18 23:28 ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-19 0:57 ` Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-19 1:26 ` Rogelio Serrano
2004-11-19 1:41 ` Helge Hess
2004-11-19 4:26 ` Gregory John Casamento
2004-11-19 5:49 ` Matt Austern
2004-11-19 6:42 ` Ziemowit Laski
2004-11-19 7:52 ` Phil Edwards
2004-11-22 3:22 ` Chuck Robey
2004-11-22 10:07 ` Phil Edwards
2004-11-22 10:31 ` Ranjit Mathew
2004-11-19 19:44 ` Dale Johannesen
2004-11-19 20:04 ` Dan Grillo
2004-11-19 20:08 ` Dave Korn
2004-11-19 13:31 Richard Kenner
2004-11-19 20:22 ` Ziemowit Laski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041117224033.7788.qmail@web41601.mail.yahoo.com \
--to=greg_casamento@yahoo.com \
--cc=discuss-gnustep@gnu.org \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=lars.sonchocky-helldorf@hamburg.de \
--cc=mrs@apple.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).