From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4026 invoked by alias); 17 Nov 2004 22:40:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3932 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2004 22:40:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO web41601.mail.yahoo.com) (66.218.93.101) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 17 Nov 2004 22:40:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 7790 invoked by uid 60001); 17 Nov 2004 22:40:33 -0000 Message-ID: <20041117224033.7788.qmail@web41601.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [138.88.179.162] by web41601.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:40:33 PST Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 22:54:00 -0000 From: Gregory John Casamento Subject: Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? To: Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf , Mike Stump Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, discuss-gnustep@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <93CA0604-38E1-11D9-9815-0030654C2998@hamburg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00584.txt.bz2 Guys.. This type of outburst is atypical coming from me, but I must say this... Argh!! C'mon... c'mon... c'mon... ObjC++ has been perpetually forthcoming for the past two years! What does it take to get Objective-C++ in? It has been so frustrating waiting for this. There is *so much software* which would be trivial to reuse once this is done. Please, just get past all of the politics and get it in! GJC --- Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 17.11.04 um 21:26 Uhr schrieb Mike Stump: > > > On Nov 17, 2004, at 1:58 AM, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf wrote: > >> I wanted to ask what the current status of Objective-C++ for mainline > >> gcc is. While there have been a lot of activity on the gcc-patches > >> and gcc-cvs lists several month ago it is now relatively silent > >> regarding this topic. Is all the work done now or did the release > >> plan slip backwards (to 4.1 or whatever)? > > > > Last I knew, everything was solidly wedged behind Geoff's objection > > with no plan forward. The objection will either have to be withdrawn, > > or Geoff will have to communicate his vision before any progress can > > be made. > > What kind of objection was that? (you can give me a pointer to the > archived mail at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/ or so) > > Would it be possible to ask Geoff to get down to business? > > > > > I think this should be resolved now, as as we push it forward, it will > > pass the drop dead date, and objective-c++ will have to be jettisoned > > from gcc 4.0.0. :-( > > > > Mark, I suppose we can discuss when that drop dead date is. Has it > > already passed? > > Hopefully not! > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Discuss-gnustep mailing list > > Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnustep mailing list > Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep > ===== Gregory John Casamento -- CEO/President Open Logic Corp. (A Maryland Corporation) #### Maintainer of Gorm for GNUstep.