From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-105454-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 31454 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2004 23:36:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31109 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2004 23:36:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO r-rr.iij4u.or.jp) (210.130.0.76)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 18 Nov 2004 23:36:44 -0000
Received: from localhost (frgw.3in.ne.jp [210.251.121.226])
	by r-rr.iij4u.or.jp (8.11.6+IIJ/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iAINagw27059
	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 08:36:42 +0900 (JST)
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 23:43:00 -0000
Message-Id: <20041119.083554.123993483.kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp>
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [cft] subreg validation round 2
From: Kaz Kojima <kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp>
In-Reply-To: <20041117184009.GA12257@redhat.com>
References: <20041117184009.GA12257@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00647.txt.bz2

Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> wrote:
> This passes on i686, alpha, ia64, powerpc linux, and sparc-solaris.
> Given Ulrich's previous testing, it *ought* to pass on s390.  Any
> other takers before I check it in and have to pick up pieces after
> the fact?

FYI, bootstrapped successfully on sh4-unknown-linux-gnu.  The native
regtest hasn't completed yet, though there are no regressions on x86
cross sh4-unknown-linux-gnu.

Regards,
	kaz